<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1405 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268596</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was examined for housekeeping services and gardening services used to maintain the factory environment for manufacture. Prior precedent was relied on to support eligibility, and the Revenue did not dislodge the settled legal position treating such services as connected with manufacturing operations. On that basis, the credit was held admissible for the impugned services, and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:07:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1405 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268596</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was examined for housekeeping services and gardening services used to maintain the factory environment for manufacture. Prior precedent was relied on to support eligibility, and the Revenue did not dislodge the settled legal position treating such services as connected with manufacturing operations. On that basis, the credit was held admissible for the impugned services, and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>