<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1403 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the appellant as the rightful owner of impugned gold goods, based on established ownership and procurement evidence. The earlier order was not enforced, necessitating a fresh consideration. The appellant&#039;s legitimate acquisition through proper channels and payment was undisputed. Consequently, the goods were released to the appellant, with no penalties imposed. The decision hinged on the undisputed identity of the appellant and proper documentation proving lawful acquisition of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1403 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the appellant as the rightful owner of impugned gold goods, based on established ownership and procurement evidence. The earlier order was not enforced, necessitating a fresh consideration. The appellant&#039;s legitimate acquisition through proper channels and payment was undisputed. Consequently, the goods were released to the appellant, with no penalties imposed. The decision hinged on the undisputed identity of the appellant and proper documentation proving lawful acquisition of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>