<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1400 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It emphasized the provisional nature of the assessment order, allowing the refund claim without challenging the conditional order. The Tribunal also confirmed the requirement to refund the excess duty paid by the respondent in line with the Board&#039;s Circular, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1400 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It emphasized the provisional nature of the assessment order, allowing the refund claim without challenging the conditional order. The Tribunal also confirmed the requirement to refund the excess duty paid by the respondent in line with the Board&#039;s Circular, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>