<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1397 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268588</link>
    <description>Mis-declared import of old and used monitors attracted confiscation because the import documents omitted the specific description, make, model and quantity, and such goods were restricted and required a licence. However, the redemption fine and penalty were reduced because the difference between the declared value and the enhanced value was comparatively small and the original amounts were considered disproportionate to the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2015 01:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1397 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268588</link>
      <description>Mis-declared import of old and used monitors attracted confiscation because the import documents omitted the specific description, make, model and quantity, and such goods were restricted and required a licence. However, the redemption fine and penalty were reduced because the difference between the declared value and the enhanced value was comparatively small and the original amounts were considered disproportionate to the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>