<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1370 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the transactions were conducted for commercial expediency and genuine business needs, with no evidence of irregularities or unaccounted funds. Therefore, the penalties were deemed unwarranted, and the appeals against their deletion were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 23:51:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1370 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2009-10. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the transactions were conducted for commercial expediency and genuine business needs, with no evidence of irregularities or unaccounted funds. Therefore, the penalties were deemed unwarranted, and the appeals against their deletion were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>