<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1361 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268552</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A) order and upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision regarding the non-deduction of TDS on payments to Forwarding and Clearing Agents. The Tribunal found no evidence of reimbursement in the bills from the agents and upheld the disallowance due to the lack of TDS deduction. The previous ITAT decision in the Assessees&#039; own case supported the disallowance. Consequently, both appeals by the Revenue were allowed, with orders pronounced on 5.10.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1361 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268552</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A) order and upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision regarding the non-deduction of TDS on payments to Forwarding and Clearing Agents. The Tribunal found no evidence of reimbursement in the bills from the agents and upheld the disallowance due to the lack of TDS deduction. The previous ITAT decision in the Assessees&#039; own case supported the disallowance. Consequently, both appeals by the Revenue were allowed, with orders pronounced on 5.10.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>