<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 60 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1269</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appellant&#039;s claim for drawback amounting to Rs. 72,090 due to a lack of proof of export under the claim. Despite acknowledging the genuineness of the claim, the rejection was upheld based on the absence of supporting documents. The appellant argued that all necessary papers were filed in 1990 and provided bank certificates and other documents to establish the export. The denial of the claim was deemed unjust by the appellant and the learned DR, considering the acknowledged legitimacy of the claim. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant based on the established basis of the claim and supporting documents provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 60 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1269</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appellant&#039;s claim for drawback amounting to Rs. 72,090 due to a lack of proof of export under the claim. Despite acknowledging the genuineness of the claim, the rejection was upheld based on the absence of supporting documents. The appellant argued that all necessary papers were filed in 1990 and provided bank certificates and other documents to establish the export. The denial of the claim was deemed unjust by the appellant and the learned DR, considering the acknowledged legitimacy of the claim. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant based on the established basis of the claim and supporting documents provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>