<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1359 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2006-07, affirming that rental income should be treated as income from house property. For AY 2008-09, the Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the allowance of interest and finance charges as revenue expenditure, instructing a reassessment by the AO due to new submissions presented during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 23:50:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1359 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2006-07, affirming that rental income should be treated as income from house property. For AY 2008-09, the Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the allowance of interest and finance charges as revenue expenditure, instructing a reassessment by the AO due to new submissions presented during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>