<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1146 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175595</link>
    <description>Prior sanction for reopening an assessment must be preceded by recorded reasons and fair consideration of the assessee&#039;s objections. A mechanically granted approval without dealing with the objections is invalid, and the reassessment notice and all proceedings founded on that sanction cannot survive. The sanction and consequential reassessment steps are therefore liable to be quashed, with the matter to be reconsidered afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:17:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1146 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175595</link>
      <description>Prior sanction for reopening an assessment must be preceded by recorded reasons and fair consideration of the assessee&#039;s objections. A mechanically granted approval without dealing with the objections is invalid, and the reassessment notice and all proceedings founded on that sanction cannot survive. The sanction and consequential reassessment steps are therefore liable to be quashed, with the matter to be reconsidered afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>