<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 82 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the correct application of Section 154 of the Customs Act and the importance of maintaining consistency in the classification of goods for levying Anti-Dumping Duty. The judgment highlighted the legal limitations on modifying demands mentioned in Show Cause Notices and the significance of adhering to the original classification of goods during adjudication processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 82 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the correct application of Section 154 of the Customs Act and the importance of maintaining consistency in the classification of goods for levying Anti-Dumping Duty. The judgment highlighted the legal limitations on modifying demands mentioned in Show Cause Notices and the significance of adhering to the original classification of goods during adjudication processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>