<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1152 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175588</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals by the assessee, quashing the reassessment orders for assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The reassessment orders were deemed beyond jurisdiction as they were based on a mere change of opinion without new material. The tribunal emphasized that reassessment cannot review the original assessment without fresh evidence, as it would be impermissible under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:09:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1152 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175588</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals by the assessee, quashing the reassessment orders for assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The reassessment orders were deemed beyond jurisdiction as they were based on a mere change of opinion without new material. The tribunal emphasized that reassessment cannot review the original assessment without fresh evidence, as it would be impermissible under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>