<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1938 (11) TMI 19 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175583</link>
    <description>Where the finding under reference was supported by evidence, the court declined to disturb it and answered the referred question in the negative. The reference therefore failed, and no order as to costs was made. The stated principle is that a reference court will not interfere with a supported factual finding when the evidence provides a sufficient basis for it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 1938 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:59:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1938 (11) TMI 19 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175583</link>
      <description>Where the finding under reference was supported by evidence, the court declined to disturb it and answered the referred question in the negative. The reference therefore failed, and no order as to costs was made. The stated principle is that a reference court will not interfere with a supported factual finding when the evidence provides a sufficient basis for it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 1938 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>