<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (10) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175579</link>
    <description>Property acquired by a money-lender in satisfaction of a debt becomes taxable as business stock only if the facts show that it was actually incorporated into the money-lending business as stock-in-trade. Mere acquisition of land in discharge of loans, or later sale at a profit, is not enough. Relevant indicators include whether the property or its income and expenditure were entered in business accounts, whether sale proceeds were used in the business, and whether the asset formed part of an integrated trading scheme. On the stated facts, the properties were held for long periods, were not reflected in business accounts, and their income was not used in the lending business, so the sale proceeds were not taxable as business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (10) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175579</link>
      <description>Property acquired by a money-lender in satisfaction of a debt becomes taxable as business stock only if the facts show that it was actually incorporated into the money-lending business as stock-in-trade. Mere acquisition of land in discharge of loans, or later sale at a profit, is not enough. Relevant indicators include whether the property or its income and expenditure were entered in business accounts, whether sale proceeds were used in the business, and whether the asset formed part of an integrated trading scheme. On the stated facts, the properties were held for long periods, were not reflected in business accounts, and their income was not used in the lending business, so the sale proceeds were not taxable as business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>