https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268548 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to impose service tax on the appellant, dismissing the appeal challenging the extended period of limitation under the Finance Act, 1994. The demand of service tax based on turnover figures, including amounts related to sundry debtors and credit notes, was upheld despite initial disagreements on certain amounts. The Court found no illegality in the impugned order passed by the CESTAT, which imposed service tax on space selling activities. Additionally, the imposition of service tax against sundry debtors and credit notes was upheld, with the Court emphasizing compliance with tax rules and principles of natural justice. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268548 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to impose service tax on the appellant, dismissing the appeal challenging the extended period of limitation under the Finance Act, 1994. The demand of service tax based on turnover figures, including amounts related to sundry debtors and credit notes, was upheld despite initial disagreements on certain amounts. The Court found no illegality in the impugned order passed by the CESTAT, which imposed service tax on space selling activities. Additionally, the imposition of service tax against sundry debtors and credit notes was upheld, with the Court emphasizing compliance with tax rules and principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268548