<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 57 - HIGH COURT,MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1259</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, ruling that the petitioners were not entitled to claim tax benefits under Sl. No. 2704 as hangers are not considered embellishments for use in manufacturing knitwear. However, the court directed the respondents to evaluate the petitioner&#039;s case under alternative schemes and determine the applicable taxes and duties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 57 - HIGH COURT,MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1259</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, ruling that the petitioners were not entitled to claim tax benefits under Sl. No. 2704 as hangers are not considered embellishments for use in manufacturing knitwear. However, the court directed the respondents to evaluate the petitioner&#039;s case under alternative schemes and determine the applicable taxes and duties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>