<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1334 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268525</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the appellants as Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 were found inapplicable. The judgment highlighted the importance of establishing violations before invoking specific rules for confiscation and penalties, leading to the set-aside of the confiscation of goods and no imposition of redemption fine or penalty on the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1334 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268525</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling in favor of the appellants as Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 were found inapplicable. The judgment highlighted the importance of establishing violations before invoking specific rules for confiscation and penalties, leading to the set-aside of the confiscation of goods and no imposition of redemption fine or penalty on the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>