https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268507 Article 226 jurisdiction of High Courts remains constitutionally available against Armed Forces Tribunal orders, because the statutory appeal scheme under Sections 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 does not oust judicial review. However, where the Act provides an efficacious appellate remedy, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily be exercised sparingly and in line with the special statutory framework, so as to avoid parallel proceedings. The statutory exclusions of Article 136(2) and Article 227(4) in relation to Armed Forces courts and tribunals do not displace Article 226. The Delhi High Court's entertainment of the writ petition was set aside, while the refusals of writ relief in the connected matters were upheld. en-us Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:55:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268507 Article 226 jurisdiction of High Courts remains constitutionally available against Armed Forces Tribunal orders, because the statutory appeal scheme under Sections 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 does not oust judicial review. However, where the Act provides an efficacious appellate remedy, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily be exercised sparingly and in line with the special statutory framework, so as to avoid parallel proceedings. The statutory exclusions of Article 136(2) and Article 227(4) in relation to Armed Forces courts and tribunals do not displace Article 226. The Delhi High Court's entertainment of the writ petition was set aside, while the refusals of writ relief in the connected matters were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268507