<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1312 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268503</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. The court held that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy of appeal under the statute and directed the appellate authority to entertain the appeal without insisting on the limitation aspect if filed within six weeks from the date of receipt of the court&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:55:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1312 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268503</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. The court held that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy of appeal under the statute and directed the appellate authority to entertain the appeal without insisting on the limitation aspect if filed within six weeks from the date of receipt of the court&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>