<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, upholding the reopening of assessments due to income escapement and disallowing excess deduction under Section 36(1)(viii). The AO was directed to verify the taxation of the withdrawn reserve amount. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for higher depreciation on reclassified assets, classifying them under &#039;Plant and Machinery&#039; and allowing depreciation at 15%. The decision was pronounced on 09/10/2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:54:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, upholding the reopening of assessments due to income escapement and disallowing excess deduction under Section 36(1)(viii). The AO was directed to verify the taxation of the withdrawn reserve amount. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for higher depreciation on reclassified assets, classifying them under &#039;Plant and Machinery&#039; and allowing depreciation at 15%. The decision was pronounced on 09/10/2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>