<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 20 - CESTAT,NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1254</link>
    <description>Welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery are not eligible for Cenvat credit, either as inputs or as capital goods, because prior Tribunal decisions, including a Larger Bench ruling, had already negated that claim. The assessee&#039;s use of the electrodes for maintenance did not change their ineligibility, so the credit was disallowed. Continued retention of the inadmissible credit after being informed that it was not allowable, without reversal, supported a finding of deliberate availment. Penalty and consequential interest were therefore upheld on the basis that there was no genuine uncertainty in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 20 - CESTAT,NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1254</link>
      <description>Welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery are not eligible for Cenvat credit, either as inputs or as capital goods, because prior Tribunal decisions, including a Larger Bench ruling, had already negated that claim. The assessee&#039;s use of the electrodes for maintenance did not change their ineligibility, so the credit was disallowed. Continued retention of the inadmissible credit after being informed that it was not allowable, without reversal, supported a finding of deliberate availment. Penalty and consequential interest were therefore upheld on the basis that there was no genuine uncertainty in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>