<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1044 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remitting issues related to section 40A(3) back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The disallowance under section 40a(ia) for non-deduction of TDS was upheld due to the assessee&#039;s failure to comply with TDS provisions. The Tribunal directed the AO to reevaluate the cash payment issues in line with specific directions and legal precedents, including determining the nature of agricultural produce.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1044 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remitting issues related to section 40A(3) back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The disallowance under section 40a(ia) for non-deduction of TDS was upheld due to the assessee&#039;s failure to comply with TDS provisions. The Tribunal directed the AO to reevaluate the cash payment issues in line with specific directions and legal precedents, including determining the nature of agricultural produce.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>