https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175570 An arbitral award was held unsustainable where it did not decide the specific disputes referred for arbitration. The reference required findings on distinct questions, including the correctness and scientific basis of the quantity calculation adopted by the Chief Conservator of Forests and whether it should operate generally from a specified date. The award merely repeated the administrative determination and declared it final and binding, without addressing the remaining issues. That failure to apply mind to the full reference justified interference, so the High Court's order setting aside the award and remitting the matter for fresh decision was upheld. en-us Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:33:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175570 An arbitral award was held unsustainable where it did not decide the specific disputes referred for arbitration. The reference required findings on distinct questions, including the correctness and scientific basis of the quantity calculation adopted by the Chief Conservator of Forests and whether it should operate generally from a specified date. The award merely repeated the administrative determination and declared it final and binding, without addressing the remaining issues. That failure to apply mind to the full reference justified interference, so the High Court's order setting aside the award and remitting the matter for fresh decision was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175570