<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 895 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175568</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition due to delay condonation in a case where the Bikaner Urban Improvement Trust allotted a plot to the respondent, who faced unauthorized road construction by the Trust. The Trust challenged the relief granted, citing respondent&#039;s negligence and limitation period, which were rejected. The Court emphasized responsible behavior in litigation by statutory authorities, discouraging frivolous objections. It stressed fair treatment of citizens, criticized unwarranted litigation, and urged compliance with decisions to reduce unnecessary disputes. The Trust&#039;s resistance to minimal relief was condemned, highlighting the importance of serving the public and avoiding baseless litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 895 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175568</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition due to delay condonation in a case where the Bikaner Urban Improvement Trust allotted a plot to the respondent, who faced unauthorized road construction by the Trust. The Trust challenged the relief granted, citing respondent&#039;s negligence and limitation period, which were rejected. The Court emphasized responsible behavior in litigation by statutory authorities, discouraging frivolous objections. It stressed fair treatment of citizens, criticized unwarranted litigation, and urged compliance with decisions to reduce unnecessary disputes. The Trust&#039;s resistance to minimal relief was condemned, highlighting the importance of serving the public and avoiding baseless litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>