<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 686 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175564</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals regarding the validity of quarry leases and the demand for the price of granite blocks by the State. The Court clarified that the demand was compensatory, not a penalty, under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals Act. The appellants, who operated under interim orders, were obligated to compensate the State for minerals raised once the appeals were dismissed. The Court emphasized that ignorance of the appeal dismissal did not excuse the appellants from their obligations. The appeals were dismissed without costs, allowing the appellants to seek relief from the State Government in the amount calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 686 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175564</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals regarding the validity of quarry leases and the demand for the price of granite blocks by the State. The Court clarified that the demand was compensatory, not a penalty, under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals Act. The appellants, who operated under interim orders, were obligated to compensate the State for minerals raised once the appeals were dismissed. The Court emphasized that ignorance of the appeal dismissal did not excuse the appellants from their obligations. The appeals were dismissed without costs, allowing the appellants to seek relief from the State Government in the amount calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>