https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175561 The court upheld the Information Commissioner's decision as legal and valid, dismissing the appeal challenging it. It ruled that the information sought did not fall under the exemption of Section 8(1)(d) of the Right to Information Act, emphasizing transparency in government dealings. The court also affirmed the respondent's right to request information, rejecting arguments on locus standi. Additionally, it addressed concerns of natural justice by providing the intervener with an opportunity to be heard. The appeal was dismissed, highlighting the public's right to access information on government decisions. en-us Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:25:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175561 The court upheld the Information Commissioner's decision as legal and valid, dismissing the appeal challenging it. It ruled that the information sought did not fall under the exemption of Section 8(1)(d) of the Right to Information Act, emphasizing transparency in government dealings. The court also affirmed the respondent's right to request information, rejecting arguments on locus standi. Additionally, it addressed concerns of natural justice by providing the intervener with an opportunity to be heard. The appeal was dismissed, highlighting the public's right to access information on government decisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175561