<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 553 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175556</link>
    <description>Proper sanction was required before the prosecution could proceed, and the sanctioning authority was expected to consider all relevant materials, including statements recorded by the Investigating Officer. Consideration of only a vigilance report was insufficient to show application of mind, so the prosecution was not maintainable for want of valid sanction. Once that defect was found, the courts below ought not to have examined the merits of the prosecution case, and their findings on merits were expunged. It was left open to the State to proceed afresh after obtaining the necessary sanction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 553 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175556</link>
      <description>Proper sanction was required before the prosecution could proceed, and the sanctioning authority was expected to consider all relevant materials, including statements recorded by the Investigating Officer. Consideration of only a vigilance report was insufficient to show application of mind, so the prosecution was not maintainable for want of valid sanction. Once that defect was found, the courts below ought not to have examined the merits of the prosecution case, and their findings on merits were expunged. It was left open to the State to proceed afresh after obtaining the necessary sanction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>