https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1249 The appellant challenged the imposition of a penalty for non-payment of duty on processed fabrics, despite admitting to the duty demand. The discrepancy in fabric meters was acknowledged, attributed to an oversight rectified upon discovery. The appellant argued against pre-deposit of penalty, citing precedents. However, the court upheld the penalty, distinguishing the case from previous decisions where penalties were not imposed due to specific circumstances. The penalty was deemed appropriate given the admitted failure to pay duty and register goods, with no grounds for appeal. en-us Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1249 The appellant challenged the imposition of a penalty for non-payment of duty on processed fabrics, despite admitting to the duty demand. The discrepancy in fabric meters was acknowledged, attributed to an oversight rectified upon discovery. The appellant argued against pre-deposit of penalty, citing precedents. However, the court upheld the penalty, distinguishing the case from previous decisions where penalties were not imposed due to specific circumstances. The penalty was deemed appropriate given the admitted failure to pay duty and register goods, with no grounds for appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1249