<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1280 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268471</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to reduce the trading addition, delete the disallowance of interest, and eliminate the addition on excessive interest payment. The ITAT emphasized the importance of consistency in legal decisions and the requirement for substantial evidence to support any disallowances or additions by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1280 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268471</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to reduce the trading addition, delete the disallowance of interest, and eliminate the addition on excessive interest payment. The ITAT emphasized the importance of consistency in legal decisions and the requirement for substantial evidence to support any disallowances or additions by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>