<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1274 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on both issues. The Tribunal reinstated the A.O.&#039;s assessments of Rs. 4,83,500 as Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) for the Pinnacle property and Rs. 21,27,723 as the cost of acquisition for the Essel Tower property, correcting the STCG to Rs. 28,72,276 for the latter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1274 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on both issues. The Tribunal reinstated the A.O.&#039;s assessments of Rs. 4,83,500 as Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) for the Pinnacle property and Rs. 21,27,723 as the cost of acquisition for the Essel Tower property, correcting the STCG to Rs. 28,72,276 for the latter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>