<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1258 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268449</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to set aside the Adjudication order regarding a refund claim of Service Tax on &quot;Technical Testing and Analysis Service.&quot; The Tribunal upheld the decision based on the limitation issue alone, emphasizing that the original claim was filed within the prescribed time frame and any delays were due to technical deficiencies and unjustified actions by the revenue department. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the respondent&#039;s cross objection was disposed of. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory timelines in refund claim matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:51:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1258 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268449</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to set aside the Adjudication order regarding a refund claim of Service Tax on &quot;Technical Testing and Analysis Service.&quot; The Tribunal upheld the decision based on the limitation issue alone, emphasizing that the original claim was filed within the prescribed time frame and any delays were due to technical deficiencies and unjustified actions by the revenue department. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the respondent&#039;s cross objection was disposed of. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory timelines in refund claim matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>