<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the lower appellate Authority&#039;s decision and granting the appellant a refund of unutilized cenvat credit totaling Rs. 13,88,262. The Tribunal held that services benefiting overseas entities are considered exports of services used outside India, in line with precedents like Paul Merchants vs. CCE, Chandigarh and Microsoft Corporation (India) Pvt. Limited vs. CST, New Delhi.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the lower appellate Authority&#039;s decision and granting the appellant a refund of unutilized cenvat credit totaling Rs. 13,88,262. The Tribunal held that services benefiting overseas entities are considered exports of services used outside India, in line with precedents like Paul Merchants vs. CCE, Chandigarh and Microsoft Corporation (India) Pvt. Limited vs. CST, New Delhi.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>