<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268442</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal, through Member (J), upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat credit on Vehicle Maintenance, Group Health Insurance, Garden Maintenance, and Entertainment Services. The Tribunal found a direct contribution of these services to the manufacturing activities, deeming them integral to the manufacturing process. Consequently, the appeal against the partial disallowance of credit, as per the Order-in-Appeal, was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268442</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal, through Member (J), upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat credit on Vehicle Maintenance, Group Health Insurance, Garden Maintenance, and Entertainment Services. The Tribunal found a direct contribution of these services to the manufacturing activities, deeming them integral to the manufacturing process. Consequently, the appeal against the partial disallowance of credit, as per the Order-in-Appeal, was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>