https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268441 The appeal filed by the Revenue was disposed of, affirming the ineligibility of the respondent to claim cenvat credit on GTA Services for supplying finished goods to depots. The judgment highlighted the importance of the "place of removal" concept in determining cenvat credit eligibility for manufacturers and job workers, aligning with a previous Tribunal ruling on a similar issue. The decision modified the impugned order to quantify the demand for cenvat credit accordingly. en-us Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Nov 2015 06:50:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268441 The appeal filed by the Revenue was disposed of, affirming the ineligibility of the respondent to claim cenvat credit on GTA Services for supplying finished goods to depots. The judgment highlighted the importance of the "place of removal" concept in determining cenvat credit eligibility for manufacturers and job workers, aligning with a previous Tribunal ruling on a similar issue. The decision modified the impugned order to quantify the demand for cenvat credit accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268441