<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1236 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268427</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the previous judgment regarding the extension of the warehousing period for imported goods, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal. The Court directed the recalculation of interest on the duty amount, agreeing with the appellant&#039;s concerns over incorrect calculations. The appellant was given two months to pay the balance amount of interest, after which the Bank Guarantee would be discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1236 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268427</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the previous judgment regarding the extension of the warehousing period for imported goods, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal. The Court directed the recalculation of interest on the duty amount, agreeing with the appellant&#039;s concerns over incorrect calculations. The appellant was given two months to pay the balance amount of interest, after which the Bank Guarantee would be discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>