<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1233 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268424</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962. It held that the Senior Intelligence Officer had the authority to issue the summons as DRI officials were appointed as customs officers. The court found no merit in the petitioners&#039; arguments and deemed the petition premature, dismissing it without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1233 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268424</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962. It held that the Senior Intelligence Officer had the authority to issue the summons as DRI officials were appointed as customs officers. The court found no merit in the petitioners&#039; arguments and deemed the petition premature, dismissing it without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>