https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175548 The Supreme Court of India held that amendments to Rules 49, 63, 65A and 67 and Form P-5 of the Delhi Land Revenue Rules were ultra vires the Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 and the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954. The statutory scheme required the record of rights and Annual Register to reflect cultivating or occupying persons across the covered areas, and Rule 63 could not validly exclude categories of land so that possession was omitted from the record. Rule 49 could not exclude extended abadi from field-to-field inspection, and the amendments to Rules 65A, 67 and Form P-5 were also inconsistent with the parent Acts. The amendments were therefore struck down as beyond rule-making power. en-us Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175548 The Supreme Court of India held that amendments to Rules 49, 63, 65A and 67 and Form P-5 of the Delhi Land Revenue Rules were ultra vires the Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 and the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954. The statutory scheme required the record of rights and Annual Register to reflect cultivating or occupying persons across the covered areas, and Rule 63 could not validly exclude categories of land so that possession was omitted from the record. Rule 49 could not exclude extended abadi from field-to-field inspection, and the amendments to Rules 65A, 67 and Form P-5 were also inconsistent with the parent Acts. The amendments were therefore struck down as beyond rule-making power. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175548