https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175545 Restrictions on newspaper speech and circulation were upheld where they were narrowly confined to matters connected with a particular agitation, aimed at preventing prejudice to communal harmony and public order, and supported by safeguards including Government satisfaction, a two-month limit, a right of representation, and limits on compelled publication. By contrast, a similar provision was struck down because it lacked limiting safeguards, especially any time limit and any opportunity for the affected person to make a representation, making the restriction excessive and unreasonable. The governing principle is that restraints on expression and newspaper trade may be valid only when they are narrowly tailored and adequately controlled. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:12:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175545 Restrictions on newspaper speech and circulation were upheld where they were narrowly confined to matters connected with a particular agitation, aimed at preventing prejudice to communal harmony and public order, and supported by safeguards including Government satisfaction, a two-month limit, a right of representation, and limits on compelled publication. By contrast, a similar provision was struck down because it lacked limiting safeguards, especially any time limit and any opportunity for the affected person to make a representation, making the restriction excessive and unreasonable. The governing principle is that restraints on expression and newspaper trade may be valid only when they are narrowly tailored and adequately controlled. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175545