https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175539 An award under Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act was treated as amenable to judicial review under Article 226, subject to restraint, because a statutory or quasi-statutory award is not immune from correction. The compensation award against workmen was held vulnerable for error of law on the face of the award, since liability was assumed merely from the illegality of the strike without examining the legal basis for actionable damage. The Act was also treated as a self-contained code, and its scheme did not authorise an employer's compensation claim for loss of profits as an industrial dispute or as relief enforceable through arbitration under the Act. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:47:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175539 An award under Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act was treated as amenable to judicial review under Article 226, subject to restraint, because a statutory or quasi-statutory award is not immune from correction. The compensation award against workmen was held vulnerable for error of law on the face of the award, since liability was assumed merely from the illegality of the strike without examining the legal basis for actionable damage. The Act was also treated as a self-contained code, and its scheme did not authorise an employer's compensation claim for loss of profits as an industrial dispute or as relief enforceable through arbitration under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175539