https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175540 The Tribunal's implementation jurisdiction under Section 35C(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules is available to enforce its directions or prevent their flouting, but not where the adjudicating authority has already passed a fresh appealable order after remand. Because the grievance related to that subsequent order, the application for implementation was held not maintainable and was dismissed, leaving the post-remand order undisturbed. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:47:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175540 The Tribunal's implementation jurisdiction under Section 35C(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules is available to enforce its directions or prevent their flouting, but not where the adjudicating authority has already passed a fresh appealable order after remand. Because the grievance related to that subsequent order, the application for implementation was held not maintainable and was dismissed, leaving the post-remand order undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175540