https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175538 Proceedings under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act were treated as akin to execution, so the Labour Court could examine whether the award relied on was a nullity and refuse enforcement if it was without jurisdiction; here, the award was found valid, so that objection failed. The Court construed the award broadly to cover workers falling within its description and held that the Sunday-work condition meant liability to be called upon to work on Sundays, not actual work on every Sunday; the respondents were therefore entitled to the benefit. It further held that no limitation period could be imported from the Payment of Wages Act or the Limitation Act, so delay did not bar the claim. en-us Thu, 09 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:44:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175538 Proceedings under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act were treated as akin to execution, so the Labour Court could examine whether the award relied on was a nullity and refuse enforcement if it was without jurisdiction; here, the award was found valid, so that objection failed. The Court construed the award broadly to cover workers falling within its description and held that the Sunday-work condition meant liability to be called upon to work on Sundays, not actual work on every Sunday; the respondents were therefore entitled to the benefit. It further held that no limitation period could be imported from the Payment of Wages Act or the Limitation Act, so delay did not bar the claim. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175538