<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT Confirms Goodwill Valuation Method; Rejects Claims of Deceptive Slump Sale Agreement and Intangible Asset Separation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26089</link>
    <description>Question whether the valuation of goodwill is appropriate - calculation of the intangible and deprecation thereon - ITAT has rejected the view that the slump sale agreement was a colourable device. Once having held so, the agreement between the parties must be accepted in its totality. The Agreement itself does not provide for splitting up of the intangibles into separate components. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:16:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:16:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT Confirms Goodwill Valuation Method; Rejects Claims of Deceptive Slump Sale Agreement and Intangible Asset Separation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26089</link>
      <description>Question whether the valuation of goodwill is appropriate - calculation of the intangible and deprecation thereon - ITAT has rejected the view that the slump sale agreement was a colourable device. Once having held so, the agreement between the parties must be accepted in its totality. The Agreement itself does not provide for splitting up of the intangibles into separate components. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:16:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>