<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 22 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1236</link>
    <description>Retrospective trade mark registration from the application date establishes the appellant&#039;s ownership of the &quot;REIZ&quot; mark for the relevant period. The appellant therefore could not be treated as using another person&#039;s brand name when claiming the small scale industry exemption. Earlier use of the mark by another concern did not defeat the claim because concurrent registration is permissible and the appellant&#039;s registration remained valid and operative. The SSI exemption applied, so the duty demand, penalty and interest based on alleged use of another person&#039;s brand name could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 22 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1236</link>
      <description>Retrospective trade mark registration from the application date establishes the appellant&#039;s ownership of the &quot;REIZ&quot; mark for the relevant period. The appellant therefore could not be treated as using another person&#039;s brand name when claiming the small scale industry exemption. Earlier use of the mark by another concern did not defeat the claim because concurrent registration is permissible and the appellant&#039;s registration remained valid and operative. The SSI exemption applied, so the duty demand, penalty and interest based on alleged use of another person&#039;s brand name could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>