<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1214 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268405</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision on all three issues in the case. It found that the Assessee correctly disclosed the contract receipts, accepted the explanation for the purchase discrepancy, and determined that the service tax disallowance under Section 43B was not applicable. The appeal was dismissed, with the Court emphasizing the lack of legal grounds raised by the Revenue and supporting the ITAT&#039;s findings after thorough analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:55:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1214 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268405</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision on all three issues in the case. It found that the Assessee correctly disclosed the contract receipts, accepted the explanation for the purchase discrepancy, and determined that the service tax disallowance under Section 43B was not applicable. The appeal was dismissed, with the Court emphasizing the lack of legal grounds raised by the Revenue and supporting the ITAT&#039;s findings after thorough analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>