<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1213 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268404</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, determining that the income from selling two flats under a collaboration agreement did not constitute an &#039;adventure in the nature of trade.&#039; The Assessee correctly declared long term capital gains, rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s classification of the income as business profits. The Court set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1213 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268404</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, determining that the income from selling two flats under a collaboration agreement did not constitute an &#039;adventure in the nature of trade.&#039; The Assessee correctly declared long term capital gains, rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s classification of the income as business profits. The Court set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>