https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268393 The Tribunal concluded that despite rectifying errors in investment amounts and income figures, the assessee was deemed an investor, not a dealer in shares. The decision to disallow expenditure under Section 14A was upheld based on the assessee's reporting and lack of quantitative share details. The Tribunal's order rectified mistakes but affirmed the disallowance, disposing of the assessee's Miscellaneous Applications accordingly. en-us Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:54:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268393 The Tribunal concluded that despite rectifying errors in investment amounts and income figures, the assessee was deemed an investor, not a dealer in shares. The decision to disallow expenditure under Section 14A was upheld based on the assessee's reporting and lack of quantitative share details. The Tribunal's order rectified mistakes but affirmed the disallowance, disposing of the assessee's Miscellaneous Applications accordingly. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268393