https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268364 Non-compliance with a Tribunal stay order requiring pre-deposit can justify dismissal of the appeal where the appellant neither makes the directed deposit nor produces any stay from a higher forum. The text notes that the appellant failed to comply with the earlier stay conditions and, despite having approached the High Court, did not place any superior court stay before the Tribunal. In those circumstances, the Tribunal exercised its power under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction. en-us Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:44:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268364 Non-compliance with a Tribunal stay order requiring pre-deposit can justify dismissal of the appeal where the appellant neither makes the directed deposit nor produces any stay from a higher forum. The text notes that the appellant failed to comply with the earlier stay conditions and, despite having approached the High Court, did not place any superior court stay before the Tribunal. In those circumstances, the Tribunal exercised its power under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268364