<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1162 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268353</link>
    <description>In clubbing of clearances, where separate units are projected and the record indicates independent functioning, each allegedly dummy unit must be issued a show cause notice and heard before its clearances are merged with those of the assessee. A unit&#039;s genuineness or dummy status cannot be determined without putting that unit to notice when its independent existence is in issue. The Tribunal&#039;s remand for fresh notices and de novo consideration was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1162 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268353</link>
      <description>In clubbing of clearances, where separate units are projected and the record indicates independent functioning, each allegedly dummy unit must be issued a show cause notice and heard before its clearances are merged with those of the assessee. A unit&#039;s genuineness or dummy status cannot be determined without putting that unit to notice when its independent existence is in issue. The Tribunal&#039;s remand for fresh notices and de novo consideration was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>