<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1161 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268352</link>
    <description>Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act treats the assessable value as the normal price where sales are to an unrelated buyer and the price is the sole consideration. The third proviso applies only when the assessee arranges that goods are generally not sold except to or through a related person. Here, regular and genuine sales were also made to an independent buyer at substantially the same price, and that price was not shown to differ materially from the alleged related buyer&#039;s price. In those circumstances, the independent buyer&#039;s price remained the normal price, and the downstream price of the alleged related buyer could not be adopted for valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1161 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268352</link>
      <description>Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act treats the assessable value as the normal price where sales are to an unrelated buyer and the price is the sole consideration. The third proviso applies only when the assessee arranges that goods are generally not sold except to or through a related person. Here, regular and genuine sales were also made to an independent buyer at substantially the same price, and that price was not shown to differ materially from the alleged related buyer&#039;s price. In those circumstances, the independent buyer&#039;s price remained the normal price, and the downstream price of the alleged related buyer could not be adopted for valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>