https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268348 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of gold and the vehicle under the Customs Act, along with imposing penalties on individuals involved in smuggling. One appellant was directed to predeposit Rs. 25,00,000, with the balance penalty waived, while the second appellant, alleged to have abetted smuggling, was granted a predeposit waiver due to insufficient evidence of active involvement. The decision considered specific roles and evidence for each appellant, ensuring fairness in the legal proceedings. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268348 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of gold and the vehicle under the Customs Act, along with imposing penalties on individuals involved in smuggling. One appellant was directed to predeposit Rs. 25,00,000, with the balance penalty waived, while the second appellant, alleged to have abetted smuggling, was granted a predeposit waiver due to insufficient evidence of active involvement. The decision considered specific roles and evidence for each appellant, ensuring fairness in the legal proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268348