https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268346 The tribunal set aside the revocation of the Customs broker license and forfeiture of the security deposit due to the gross violation of Regulation 22 of the CHALR, 2004, which mandated a specific timeline for proceedings. The appellant's failure to fulfill obligations under certain regulations was noted, but the delay in investigations and the introduction of new norms post-filing were considered. The tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to prescribed timelines in subordinate legislation, leading to the decision to allow the appeal based on the unsustainable timeline of the proceedings. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268346 The tribunal set aside the revocation of the Customs broker license and forfeiture of the security deposit due to the gross violation of Regulation 22 of the CHALR, 2004, which mandated a specific timeline for proceedings. The appellant's failure to fulfill obligations under certain regulations was noted, but the delay in investigations and the introduction of new norms post-filing were considered. The tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to prescribed timelines in subordinate legislation, leading to the decision to allow the appeal based on the unsustainable timeline of the proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268346